Flipping the lens, and becoming Neil. [Podcast]

Cicadas chirping, cabbage trees awakening to a summer breeze and with the rest of the house emerging to another day of an island escape UX retreat, I was interviewed for a podcast by Chris from We Create Futures.

This was flipping the lens, because interviewing people is the basis for so much of my work, but now for the first time I was the subject.

And becoming Neil? … well, it’s not the first time I’ve been confused with a musician … Most people know me as Bomo, not Bono. But in his introduction to the podcast, Chris likens me to a Neil (Not Young or a Diamond).

You’ll find out which Neil, by listening online.

Or you can download it as a file.

We talk about my make or break childhood, the winding road from factory floors of the snow/surf industry, through architectural and UX design in London, to my experience coaching execs to understand their customers as part of my work today in design research.

Chris injects topics of curiosity, creativity, generosity … and my book – USERPALOOZA, which I’m super proud of. (Also available on Amazon)

The podcast is 20 mins long and my bit starts at 1:15 (including Fleetwood Mac reference).

Thanks to Chris for hosting!


Userpalooza car seat 760

USERPALOOZA! I wrote a book.

Yes, an actual book. Spine. Cover. Pages. Ok, it’s a draft in the photo, but …Somebody pinch me!

USERPALOOZA is a how-to for planning and conducting field research – to connect with customers in their context – to understand how they think and behave around your product, service or category.

…Because it’s easier to design for a customer you understand.

It started two years ago, when I wrote this sticky note and slapped it on my monitor:

This sticky note travelled with me during fieldwork. I couldn't escape it's call to arms. It won a two year battle of wills.

This sticky note travelled with me during fieldwork. I couldn’t escape it’s call to arms. It won a two year battle of wills.

The sticky note soon became a companion, a travelling and motivating call to action as I squeezed writing time into my working days.

Friends asked:

‘Isn’t that shooting yourself in the foot?’

‘Won’t people buy the book instead of hiring you?’

Continue reading

Safety in numbers during design research


On the edge of NYC in a sleeting-cold January storm, two colleagues and I arrived at a home visit with instructions to ‘go round back’.

Without going into detail, ‘round back’ did not look like a safe place to visit, and we made the joint call to bail out.

This was the first time I’ve abandoned a user research session, and I was so pleased not to be alone. In fact, had I been alone, I’m fairly sure I would have gone ahead out of duty to the client and the project, brushing off any safety concerns, despite what my instinct was telling me.

The shared experience forced a rethink in my practice — one fuelled by reaching out to a community of researchers to hear their experiences and approaches to staying safe while in the field, something I’d never given much thought.

When I mentioned risk and safety to some colleagues, I opened a can of worms, and war stories, one involving a guns-blazing police situation where the researcher was handcuffed on a drug-runner’s couch…

“Next thing I know I’m handcuffed with actual police handcuffs on”

Those who’ve read Steve Portigal’s book on User Research War stories will know there’s a raft of encounters awaiting the intrepid researchermostly humorous in hindsightbut after this bailout experience I had a few enlightening conversations which have changed my approach. I’ve summarised the learnings from these below with a few direct quotes from experienced researchers, and some principles worth adopting if you spend time visiting peoples homes or workplaces. 

The big one being…

Pair up!

Always take a partner. For many researchers it’s a deal breaker.

“I never go solo, we don’t know what we’re walking into”

“If I can’t get resources to bring another person if traveling, I won’t do the research”

Risks people mentioned ranged from uncomfortable atmospheres, through to being intimidated, to physical danger or being accused of something during or post the session … none of which anyone signs up for, especially alone.

Some companies mandate that researchers never conduct fieldwork alone. The second person is built into the project from the start.

“It’s company policy, you must bring a secondary person or the study will be cancelled. We’ve cancelled visits when our second person’s flight was late. It’s just not worth the risks”

Dynamic duo

Having a partner in the field is a solid rule of thumb, not just for safety, but the quality and impact of your work.
On a practical level, having a dedicated note-taker allows the lead researcher to be more present and focus on the conversation.
A duo of researchers is a natural and common pairing, each understanding the landscape and knowing the other has ‘got your back’.

If your partner/note taker is a client the immersion and exposure in their customer’s world can be an invaluable eye opener. If several stake-holders can join you over the course of a few days this can convert skeptics and contribute to a culture of being customer centred, building appetite for more or more focused research. This will prove itself immediately in the field, then again during later stages, especially when sharing back to the wider team. As I explain in ‘You had to be there’.

Convincing a client or stakeholder to ride shotgun can involve persuasion when time commitment seems onerous or buy-in isn’t there (yet) and can provide a similarly welcome dynamic in the field, plus, hearing the client’s responses or questions helps you tune into what’s important and relevant to the business/design decisions they are facing.

Introducing bias, revealing agendas, asking inappropriate questions etc. are a different kind of risk, and can be overcome by a solid briefing on how to behave, what good note taking needs to cover and even what not to wear.

Other practical steps

I heard many tactics to add a layer of comfort while in the field, from self defence classes and carrying to pepper spray to the more pedestrian list below:

  • During recruitment, ask participants to send photos of themselves in their home environment,
  • Share your appointment schedule with someone, let them know when you check-in/out of a session,
  • Have a ‘code phrase’ you mention to your partner when either of you feel it’s time to bug out, like ’the camera is malfunctioning / we’ll need to reschedule’,
  • Set your alarm to go off, or ask someone to call you 10 minutes into the session to provide an alibi for a snappy exit,
  • If your client has the money but not the time, hire a videographer to accompany you, adding to the richness of the data and stories you collect,
  • If they have neither, reach out to universities for students to ride along. Psychology, Film, HCI, or research departments. They may have students who’d love to be part of a live project,
  • If you’re running a team make it known that it’s totally OK to back out of a visit if it feels uncomfortable (solo or as a pair). That it’s the researcher’s prerogative to make this call and that it will be respected,
  • If you’re working with communities where there may be an inherent risk, opt to meet in a public space like a cafe.

Safety works both ways…

“Paired researchers can encourage the safety and psychological comfort of both parties”

I’ve had participants express their surprise that it’s ‘only me’ arriving at their home, the look on their face suggesting ‘this is a bit more intense than I thought’, so having the third person in the room can reduce this feeling.

I’ve attended many sessions in homes where it’s been clear there’s a partner or housemate ‘hovering’ to make sure the activity is legit and their friend is not being sold life insurance, that the type of questions weren’t inappropriate, so be transparent and upfront with the participant about who’s visiting, send a smiley mugshot of you and your partner in advance so they know who to expect.

Before you rush out to buy a taser…

There will be bucketloads more of this type of thing in my upcoming bookUSERPALOOZA, a field researcher’s guide. Sign up to be notified.

Huge thanks to Abby Leafe, Alison Rak, Andrea Knight Dolan, Andrea Libelo, Becca Hare, Ed Burak, Sanghee Oh, Gloria Suzie Kim, Keren Solomon, J.M, Melissa Eggleston, Rebecca Hope, Steve Portigal and Wako Takayama for sharing your views and stories…

…and for changing my approach to this work.

…and all those who have commented on and offline with intelligence and sensitivity, helping me find focus in this article.

Breaking the wall in design research

Breaking the wall in Design Research

Film directors use a term to describe zooming out from the scene to deliberately demystify the production process.

This reveals backstage activity usually out of the frame, like the edges of the studio set, sound crew, equipment etc..

They call this ‘breaking the wall’.

Thanks to an ambitious client, and a two minute edit from a mountain of footage, I feel like I can do something similar, at least trying to answer some design research FAQs I’m often asked. In particular the approaches and practicalities of fieldwork. Continue reading

Architectural design, meets pop-surrealism to communicate research insights

See what I mean? (Video)

A few weeks back at our very own UX Homegrown conference, I shared my story of how I combined visual communication styles from two former careers into a way to make research insights visual, and generate conversations that matter.

Here’s the video:

It was the first time I’ve spoken at an event in NZ for over three years, but it’s a story I love telling.

The story plays out over years as confidence grew, and clients encouraged me to put down the bullet points, and pick up a sharpie.

You’ll see what a slow learner I was, but I share my ‘how to’ techniques to help you get there quicker. And it seems to be working – since I first shared this story and these techniques, I’ve had some great emails from people who wouldn’t consider themselves a ‘visual person’ attaching their ‘first stabs’ – examples of visual artefacts, explaining the impact they noticed in how their team responded etc.

If you’re tired from the insights from your work gathering digital dust, and you’re feeling sketchy after the video, I go step by step through my approach in an article ‘Visualising Design Research‘ from a couple of years back.

Now go sharpen your pencil, and send me some shots!

double diamond image

Duped by the Double Diamond?

It’s a masterpiece of over-simplicity and an idealised vision of the human centred design process, but now there’s proof this blueprint for breakthroughs is a long way from reality… At least in New Zealand. (But we’re probably not alone)

Yes, I’m talking about the well-accepted Double Diamond model with its four stages of discover, define, develop and deliver.

It rolls off the tongue nicely, but what follows is a sobering view of how lop-sided it may be…

Continue reading

My expert-ness, mapped over time

On being an expert…

There was a time I was comfortable being the expert.

That’s changed.

I was asked to do an ‘expert’ experience review recently. Ever since it’s been playing on my mind – surfacing internal conflicts and self-doubt around how comfortable I am taking the role of ‘expert’ in this field.

It’s a feeling that’s changed with time, so I mapped it.

Continue reading